The
chosen animation for this aesthetic evaluation is Larva. One criterion has been
set based on objectivism, i.e, logical thinking, the understanding of the animation,
the moral value and happy ending. Audience must have higher logical thinking
while watching the video voluntarily. This is because animation can give a big
influence to our thinking especially children. They will think all the behavior
that were shown in video are true and it will be
followed by them. Audience also should understand what they are watching
the whole of animation from the beginning to the end during leisure time. The understanding
of the audience in a story is important because when they
feel tired of the story they will quickly move on another
story. Then, each animation must have a moral value at the
end of the story so the audience can effectively emulate.
For me, this is the importing part while making the video because it will
affect the whole story. Next, audience must be excited if the animation that
you watch has a happy ending when tea time. Everyone will be hoping there
is a good ending in a story that we watch. Usually the
good story is when at the end we can get expecting ending
without any misleading. Based on this Larva animation, I can say that most of
my chosen criteria are achieve the goal of aesthetic evaluation. But, there
still a few thing that we can improved the animation especially at the end of
the animation, audience still difficult to understand what is trying
to convey by the director.
My
friend and I already have been set our own criteria. Firstly, Noor Baizura has
set four criteria, there is smile, sadly, loving and friendly. Secondly, Hazleen Anylia has set crying,
sympathy, laugh and happy. Then, Nurul Farhana has set the criteria is
nationalism, loving, helping and the last criteria is beauty. Among all of my group
mates, there are no similarities between my criteria with others group members.
What I can see in this discussion, everyone have their own perception about how
to evaluate the animation. For different people, we have a different opinion.
For example, we choose the same animation, the animation is Larva, but we have chosen
different criteria to evaluate the video of the animation from our own
perspective. What we can see in this discussion, we have been take decision
that, we take the best two criteria from each other. The criterion that we
choose is appropriate with the evaluation concept. The criteria from Noor
Baizura are friendly and loving. Secondly, for Hazleen Anylia we chose sympathy
and happy criteria. Then, from Nurul Farhana the criteria that are we had
chosen are nationalism and beauty and lastly from myself, I choose the logical
thinking and moral value criteria. This criterion, we used to evaluate the
animation video of Larva.
In conclusion, the evaluation concept, there are four
type of evaluation, firstly subjectivism, secondly objectivism, then relativism
and lastly is emotivism. From this discussion and judgments, everyone had chosen
one and after that, we set the criteria.
Everyone have their own criteria to evaluate the animation. Lastly, we
decide to choose eight the best criteria. We hope criteria will help us to
evaluate the animation. No one can’t say disagree to take criteria that we chosen
because everybody have their own opinion and perception.
