Debate - English Should Be The Only Medium In Design (Speaker 3)

Assalamualaikum and very good evening to all my beloved friends and my handsome lecturer, Dr. Tan Wee Hoe. I agree with our timeline that English should be the only medium in design. I barely disagree with the second speaker(negative) that said we can use many language and English doesn't important, right ? But for me,  since we are in kindergarten, we already learned English very well. To be proficient in English, we must improved our writing skills, practice our speaking skills and we can get more deep in English. Other than that, what the most important, that we want and we have desire to learn in English. To learn in English, we have many opportunities now, like an internet and library facilities that we can search and find many books, publications and the others. Then, practice make perfect, so goes the saying ! But sad to say many people not even read newspaper, beyond the lecturer notes and text books.Then, how will they improve ? 
     
     In my opinion, for my first point that I can say that competitive environment and a progressive design in globalization world is very important. This is because, English, is important to conduct a bisness. For example, when we want to sell our product especially in design, we must know how to speak in English very well then we can sell the design. Now, Malaysia is a trading nation for many bisness. Thus we can see that's why government emphasize the important of English like in tertiary level. That's us, the tertiary level. In university, we must learn and know how to speak and write in English. Okay, now I strongly agree that English should be the only medium in design. Thank You !

Critique Challenge ( Assignment 2 )

The chosen animation for this aesthetic evaluation is Larva. One criterion has been set based on objectivism, i.e, logical thinking, the understanding of the animation, the moral value and happy ending. Audience must have higher logical thinking while watching the video voluntarily. This is because animation can give a big influence to our thinking especially children. They will think all the behavior that were shown in video are true and it will be followed by them. Audience also should understand what they are watching the whole of animation from the beginning to the end during leisure time. The understanding of the audience in a story is important because when they feel tired of the story they will quickly move on another story. Then, each animation must have a moral value at the end of the story so the audience can effectively emulate. For me, this is the importing part while making the video because it will affect the whole story. Next, audience must be excited if the animation that you watch has a happy ending when tea time. Everyone will be hoping there is a good ending in a story that we watch. Usually the good story is when at the end we can get expecting ending without any misleading. Based on this Larva animation, I can say that most of my chosen criteria are achieve the goal of aesthetic evaluation. But, there still a few thing that we can improved the animation especially at the end of the animation, audience still difficult to understand what is trying to convey by the director.

My friend and I already have been set our own criteria. Firstly, Noor Baizura has set four criteria, there is smile, sadly, loving and friendly.  Secondly, Hazleen Anylia has set crying, sympathy, laugh and happy. Then, Nurul Farhana has set the criteria is nationalism, loving, helping and the last criteria is beauty. Among all of my group mates, there are no similarities between my criteria with others group members. What I can see in this discussion, everyone have their own perception about how to evaluate the animation. For different people, we have a different opinion. For example, we choose the same animation, the animation is Larva, but we have chosen different criteria to evaluate the video of the animation from our own perspective. What we can see in this discussion, we have been take decision that, we take the best two criteria from each other. The criterion that we choose is appropriate with the evaluation concept. The criteria from Noor Baizura are friendly and loving. Secondly, for Hazleen Anylia we chose sympathy and happy criteria. Then, from Nurul Farhana the criteria that are we had chosen are nationalism and beauty and lastly from myself, I choose the logical thinking and moral value criteria. This criterion, we used to evaluate the animation video of Larva.

            In conclusion, the evaluation concept, there are four type of evaluation, firstly subjectivism, secondly objectivism, then relativism and lastly is emotivism. From this discussion and judgments, everyone had chosen one and after that, we set the criteria.  Everyone have their own criteria to evaluate the animation. Lastly, we decide to choose eight the best criteria. We hope criteria will help us to evaluate the animation. No one can’t say disagree to take criteria that we chosen because everybody have their own opinion and perception.

Memory Challenge 1 (Quiz 1)

Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things by Donald A. Norman

In the Donald A. Norman’s creation of Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, the author explains how being attractive, fun and enjoyable makes a product better. This book actually describes about the discussion of the way how people interact with products and how the customers measure the quality of a product through an attractive appearance, the first half in this book will prove quite useful. It expands and shows the good relations into common practices of market segmentation and usage research also providing both concrete advises for optimizing your product for whatever your goals, as well as it follows the requirements of the several of consumer or customer preferences.

    In the first chapter, the author mostly explains about the emotions that play an important role in our daily life. He also wrote about, why he said the first functional model in the design of everyday things disabilities, how the environment affect the positive and negative thinking and can help maintain alertness in focusing, and level of thinking. Emotional also help us to make a good decision. However, negative emotional impact on some people in the focus on the things that cause problems, and if this fails to provide the solution, they were getting more tension, more concerned, and increase their concentration to those details. This case is different with positive emotions that are important along with the negative emotions. Positive emotions sometime important such as in learning make a choice, and when to make the right decision towards an object. Norman’s were briefly explained and exposed about the three levels of brains such as visceral level, behavioral level and reflective level. The first nature layer is known as visceral level while the part that contains the brain processes that control everyday behavior it is known as the behavioral level and the last is thinking part of brain, or it is call reflective level.  Nature does in visceral level and it is very well tuned to a strong emotional signals, it happen automatically and has unavoidable consequences. There was a lot of information packed into this chapter, a pleasant contrast to some of Norman’s earlier writing. A few of what is written here is based on the philosophical and aesthetic design thus some aspects of benefit design is slightly excessive in their way.

    Next, in the first part of chapter two, the author discusses about how the three levels of cognitive and emotional systems work together to help and provide to user or customer about usability and the usage of the whole product experience. The design requirements for each level are totally different in every range. He also discussed about the objects that raised up in user’s memory and give effect to them. In addition, he also explained the details of the role of emotions in design. Special attention was given to both the sentimental value of an object and the role of sense of fulfillment. Use all the opportunities to attract all the layers of consumer not straightly focus at one side only. Then, in the third chapter, Norman goes into detail about the three levels of design. Those are, if you recall, visceral, behavioral, and reflective. That roughly correlates to initial reaction, functionality, and emotion. He goes more in depth of what factors are considered and affect these three levels of design. Visceral design consists of emotions, appearance, and the first impression of an object. It is important because it become attraction to the user's attention, sometimes without knowing what the item really is or what it is for. Behavioral design is concerned with usability and become the basically of the topic of the design of everyday things. And finally reflective design, which relates to our perspective to the product. How it affects our lives, culture and other factors may affect this level of design. The appearance is a big part of how design can attract users to put in the first place.

    This book is a good way to take a new perspective of the design and it can help us to understand how design affects emotions, and how emotions affect purchasing decisions. Thus, the more beautiful and interesting of a product the easier it can be used when we can think it in creatively or innovation way. Furthermore, if our strategy fails to provide, we can seek a solution to resolve it. The author also explains about the meaning of art and design that can push our own works to be better and how to gain an advantage in term of design. Norman’s also bringing us latest with the current thinking in this field and the latest ideas in emotion-driven design, this book will prove to be essential reading for all human factors especially who had involved in design area. From the whole statement above, it is reasonable to conclude that the design of products that affect human emotion and good product design could create positive appeal to user.

Letters Upon The Aesthetic Education of Man, 1794.

In dimensions of design, it consist four type of dimension. Aesthetic dimension is one part of it.  Aesthetic is direct link to arts and philosophy. It is a set of principles concerned with the nature and appreciation of beauty. In the Frederich Schiller’s creation of On the Aesthetic Education of Man, the author mostly discuss about the term of beauty and arts from his own perspective. Beauty is very subjective in nature and must not be reduced in term of understanding but it is very mystery that must be preserved. The author also has interest in natured that based on an idea that significant in his own soul that able to generate his idea. Sometimes, nature inspires him with a sort of love and respectful in her daily life.

    There a few matters from first letter until fifth letter that the author brings up and expressed his dissatisfaction against political view in his country which is always to protect the interests of certain parties through an understanding of art and beauty. For instance, in the first letter the author speak on the liberty of action that prescribe that it was rather that necessity. It’s being a human nature, when high social class society those have authority and foreign support take part in their liberty of action. What the author wants is just freedom that everyone wishes. In any method or field, like chemist, they will find synthesis only by analysis while the arts people like an artist, the poet, and the philosopher can show it in writing or drawing.

    In the second letter, Schiller mostly discussed about the establishment and structure of a true political freedom. He also talks about the issues of man in that country that should be given a freedom of speaks and their expression. For example, they doesn’t agreed with the legislation that been decided by the government, thus, they can make a talk and discussion with them in a proper way. Other than that, they also can send a formal letter to say their right because the highest social class at that time holds a big power in the country and being a role model to others.

    When the author comes with the third letter, he said aesthetic will set man free but in the other hand, man will attain this freedom by making aesthetic judgments about works of art that only give the appearance of freedom. There are two ways for the individual person to become the ideal man, firstly, when the country care and responsible in morality, justice, sincerely and general reason through the individualities in its unity. Secondly, individual person whether man or woman can increase their own ideas and life style in maturity to be a better person by perfecting themselves. Often, man will be a leader and they will hold the system in government of a country. They also can think logically and they can make their own right decision without any interference from others because of their nature as human.

    Next, in fourth and fifth letter, the author concludes that man must have their own principles to be a good leader. Man also will learn naturally by the surroundings and from other’s way to express their way of leadership. However, human will never satisfied with the existing of the law. For example, when we use our own principles regardless of our feelings to others in the lead, our leaders cannot be justice in many sides. Thus, think carefully before making a decision. They also will always remain volatile with no physical force that would change their personality. In this conflict, aesthetic education must come in to effect the adaptation of the two principles. According to Schiller, it has as to end the fashion and polish the tendency and passions so that they will become reasonable. On the other side, freedom will be the issue from their abstract character that may unite with nature and also may spiritualize it and lastly, it becomes to be transformation of leadership.

    People will think that was only a common problem that would be faced in a rule of monarchy system. Nevertheless, this letter become a big issue when this matter happen in seventeenth century, which at that time the inferior people had very low right and difficult to get freedom of expression to say what they want. This problem that was raised by Schiller through his letters of understanding in the branch of art is very helpful and his philosophical writings be speak a deep thinking nature with great originality of conception. Other people can’t determine the way of our life otherwise we decide it ourselves. Art can be the great medium to be sincere way on behalf the action. Thus, we must generate our beauty, simplicity and purify in human nature to become a great creation in this world.