There a few matters from first letter until
fifth letter that the author
brings up and expressed his dissatisfaction against political view in his country which is always to protect the interests of certain parties through an understanding of art and beauty. For instance,
in the first letter the author speak on the liberty of action that prescribe
that it was rather that necessity. It’s being a human nature, when high social
class society those have authority and foreign support take part in their
liberty of action. What the author wants is just freedom that everyone wishes.
In any method or field, like chemist, they will find synthesis only by analysis
while the arts people like an artist,
the poet, and the philosopher can show it in writing or
drawing.
In
the second letter, Schiller mostly discussed about the establishment and
structure of a true political freedom. He
also talks about the issues of man in that country that should be given a
freedom of speaks and their expression. For example, they
doesn’t agreed with the legislation that been decided by the government, thus,
they can make a talk and discussion with them in a proper way. Other than that,
they also can send a formal letter to say their right because
the highest social class at that time holds a big power in the country and
being a role model to others.
When the author comes
with the third letter, he said aesthetic will set man free but in the other
hand, man will attain this freedom by making aesthetic judgments about works of
art that only give the appearance of freedom. There are two ways for the individual
person to become the ideal man, firstly, when the country care and responsible
in morality, justice, sincerely and general reason through the individualities
in its unity. Secondly, individual person whether man or woman can increase
their own ideas and life style in maturity to be a better person by perfecting
themselves. Often, man will be a leader and they will hold the
system in government of a country. They also can think
logically and they can make their own right decision without any interference from
others because of their nature as human.
Next, in fourth and fifth letter, the author
concludes that man must have their own principles to be a good leader.
Man also will learn naturally by the surroundings and from other’s way to
express their way of leadership. However, human will never satisfied with the
existing of the law. For example, when we use our own principles regardless
of our feelings to others in the lead, our leaders cannot
be justice in many sides. Thus, think carefully before
making a decision. They also will always remain volatile with no physical
force that would change their personality. In this conflict, aesthetic
education must come in to effect the adaptation of the two principles. According
to Schiller, it has as to end the fashion and polish the tendency and passions
so that they will become reasonable. On the other side, freedom will be the issue
from their abstract character that may unite with nature and also may
spiritualize it and lastly, it becomes to be transformation of leadership.
People
will think that was only a common problem that would be faced in a rule of
monarchy system. Nevertheless, this letter become a big issue when this matter
happen in seventeenth century, which at that time the inferior people had very
low right and difficult to get freedom of expression to say what they want. This
problem that was raised by Schiller through his letters of
understanding in the branch of art is very helpful and his
philosophical writings be speak a deep thinking nature with great originality
of conception. Other people can’t determine the way of our life otherwise we
decide it ourselves. Art can be the great medium to be sincere way on behalf
the action. Thus, we must generate our beauty, simplicity and purify in human
nature to become a great creation in this world.
No comments:
Post a Comment